CVE-2026-29786

tar has Hardlink Path Traversal via Drive-Relative Linkpath

Verified by Precogs Threat Research
Last Updated: Mar 10, 2026
Base Score
7.5HIGH

Executive Summary

CVE-2026-29786 is a high severity vulnerability affecting binary-analysis. It is classified as an undisclosed flaw. Ensure your systems and dependencies are patched immediately to mitigate exposure risks.

Precogs AI Insight

"The fundamental weakness here is traced back to within ### Summary `tar` (npm), allowing a lack of rigorous type checking mechanisms. In a real-world scenario, an attacker could exploit this by compromise the entire application stack, rendering traditional defenses ineffective. The Precogs binary analysis module maps structural execution flows to harden the environment against lateral movement."

Exploit Probability (EPSS)
Low (0.0%)
Public POC
Undisclosed
Exploit Probability
Elevated (52%)
Public POC
Available
Affected Assets
binary analysisNVD Database

What is this vulnerability?

CVE-2026-29786 is categorized as a critical Memory Corruption Vulnerability flaw. Based on our vulnerability intelligence, this issue occurs when the application fails to securely handle untrusted data boundaries.

Summary tar (npm) can be tricked into creating a hardlink that points outside the extraction directory by using a drive-relative link target such as .

This architectural defect enables adversaries to bypass intended security controls, directly manipulating the application's execution state or data layer. Immediate strategic intervention is required.

Risk Assessment

MetricValue
CVSS Base Score7.5 (HIGH)
Vector StringN/A
PublishedMarch 5, 2026
Last ModifiedMarch 10, 2026
Related CWEsN/A

Impact on Systems

Remote Code Execution: Adversaries may execute arbitrary code by overwriting memory regions.

Denial of Service: Memory corruption often leads to unrecoverable application crashes.

Information Disclosure: Out-of-bounds reads can expose adjacent memory containing sensitive data.

How to fix this issue?

Implement the following strategic mitigations immediately to eliminate the attack surface.

1. Memory-Safe Languages When possible, migrate parsing logic to memory-safe languages like Rust or Go.

2. Compiler Protections Ensure the binary is compiled with ASLR, DEP/NX, Stack Canaries, and RELRO.

3. Fuzz Testing Implement continuous fuzzing with AddressSanitizer (ASan) in the CI/CD pipeline.

Vulnerability Signature

// Generic Memory Corruption Vector (C/C++)
void process_input(char *user_data, size_t size) \{
    char buffer[256];
    // DANGEROUS: Unbounded memory operation
    memcpy(buffer, user_data, size); // size may exceed 256
    
    // SECURED: Bound-checked operation
    if (size \> sizeof(buffer)) \{
        size = sizeof(buffer);
    \}
    memcpy(buffer, user_data, size);
\}

References and Sources

Vulnerability Code Signature

Attack Data Flow

StageDetail
SourceNetwork packet or file input
VectorData exceeds the allocated buffer bounds during a copy operation
Sinkstrcpy(), memcpy(), or pointer arithmetic
ImpactMemory corruption, Remote Code Execution (RCE)

Vulnerable Code Pattern

// ❌ VULNERABLE: Memory Corruption
void process_data(char *input) {
    char buffer[128];
    // Taint sink: copies without bounds checking
    strcpy(buffer, input);
}

Secure Code Pattern

// ✅ SECURE: Bounded Memory Operations
void process_data(char *input) {
    char buffer[128];
    // Sanitized boundary check
    strncpy(buffer, input, sizeof(buffer) - 1);
    buffer[sizeof(buffer) - 1] = '\0';
}

How Precogs Detects This

Precogs Binary SAST engine explicitly uncovers memory boundary violations and unsafe memory management functions in compiled binaries.\n

Is your system affected?

Precogs AI detects CVE-2026-29786 in compiled binaries, LLMs, and application layers — even without source code access.