CVE-2025-69239
Raytha CMS is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in the\_“Themes - Import from URL” feature.
Executive Summary
CVE-2025-69239 is a low severity vulnerability affecting appsec. It is classified as Server-Side Request Forgery. Ensure your systems and dependencies are patched immediately to mitigate exposure risks.
Precogs AI Insight
"This critical flaw stems from within Raytha CMS, allowing an architectural oversight in input validation. A threat actor could leverage this oversight to silently exfiltrate sensitive routing topologies and internal schemas. The Precogs AI's Code Property Graph analysis traces untrusted input to ensure strict authentication requirements are met."
What is this vulnerability?
CVE-2025-69239 is categorized as a critical Application Verification Flaw flaw. Based on our vulnerability intelligence, this issue occurs when the application fails to securely handle untrusted data boundaries.
Raytha CMS is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in the\_“Themes - Import from URL” feature. It allows an attacker with high privileges to provide th...
This architectural defect enables adversaries to bypass intended security controls, directly manipulating the application's execution state or data layer. Immediate strategic intervention is required.
Risk Assessment
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| CVSS Base Score | 2.7 (LOW) |
| Vector String | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N |
| Published | March 16, 2026 |
| Last Modified | March 16, 2026 |
| Related CWEs | CWE-918 |
Impact on Systems
✅ Unauthorized Access: Flaws in application logic can permit unauthorized interaction with protected APIs.
✅ Data Manipulation: Adversaries may alter critical application states, such as user roles or configurations.
✅ Service Disruption: Improper error handling or unvalidated inputs can lead to resource exhaustion.
How to fix this issue?
Implement the following strategic mitigations immediately to eliminate the attack surface.
1. Defense in Depth Implement multi-layered validation (client-side, API gateway, and server-side).
2. Least Privilege Ensure backend service accounts operate with the absolute minimum rights required.
3. Security Regression Testing Integrate automated semantic security scanning into the deployment pipeline.
Vulnerability Signature
// Generic Application Security Flaw (Node.js)
app.post('/api/update-profile', (req, res) =\> \{
// DANGEROUS: Mass Assignment / Object Injection
// Attacker can pass \{ "isAdmin": true, "email": "..." \}
User.update(\{ id: req.user.id \}, req.body);
// SECURED: Explicitly select permitted fields
const \{ email, displayName, bio \} = req.body;
User.update(\{ id: req.user.id \}, \{ email, displayName, bio \});
\});
References and Sources
- NVD — CVE-2025-69239
- MITRE — CVE-2025-69239
- CWE-918 — MITRE CWE
- CWE-918 Details
- Application Security Vulnerabilities
Vulnerability Code Signature
Attack Data Flow
| Stage | Detail |
|---|---|
| Source | User-supplied URL parameter |
| Vector | Server fetches the user-controlled URL |
| Sink | HTTP request library (e.g., fetch, axios) |
| Impact | Access to internal services, metadata endpoints, or port scanning |
Vulnerable Code Pattern
// ❌ VULNERABLE: Server-Side Request Forgery
app.get('/proxy', async (req, res) => {
const targetUrl = req.query.url;
// Taint sink: unvalidated outbound request
const response = await fetch(targetUrl);
res.send(await response.text());
});
Secure Code Pattern
// ✅ SECURE: Allowlist validation
const ALLOWED_DOMAINS = ['api.partner.com'];
app.get('/proxy', async (req, res) => {
const targetUrl = new URL(req.query.url);
if (!ALLOWED_DOMAINS.includes(targetUrl.hostname)) {
return res.status(403).send("Domain not allowed");
}
// Sanitized outbound request
const response = await fetch(targetUrl.href);
res.send(await response.text());
});
How Precogs Detects This
Precogs API Security Engine actively detects SSRF vulnerabilities by tracking unvalidated URL sinks and enforcing strict allowlist policies.\n