CVE-2014-100005
D-Link DIR-600 Router Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) Vulnerability
Executive Summary
CVE-2014-100005 is a critical severity vulnerability affecting appsec. It is classified as an undisclosed flaw. This vulnerability is actively being exploited in the wild.
Precogs AI Insight
"The primary vulnerability vector is rooted in within D-Link DIR-600 routers, allowing a lack of rigorous type checking mechanisms. An attacker can craft a specific payload to trigger a denial of service state, crashing critical operational components. Precogs AI Analysis Engine leverages inter-procedural taint tracking to prevent unauthorized logical exploitation."
What is this vulnerability?
CVE-2014-100005 is categorized as a critical Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) flaw. Based on our vulnerability intelligence, this issue occurs when the application fails to securely handle untrusted data boundaries.
D-Link DIR-600 routers contain a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that allows an attacker to change router configurations by hijacking an ex.
This architectural defect enables adversaries to bypass intended security controls, directly manipulating the application's execution state or data layer. Immediate strategic intervention is required.
Risk Assessment
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| CVSS Base Score | 9.8 (CRITICAL) |
| Vector String | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| Published | May 16, 2024 |
| Last Modified | May 16, 2024 |
| Related CWEs | N/A |
Impact on Systems
✅ Session Hijacking: Attackers can steal active user session tokens (cookies) to impersonate the victim.
✅ Phishing Execution: Malicious scripts can dynamically alter DOM content to present fraudulent login forms.
✅ Worm Propagation: Stored XSS can spread autonomously as users visit the infected page.
How to fix this issue?
Implement the following strategic mitigations immediately to eliminate the attack surface.
1. Output Encoding Implement strict context-aware output encoding (HTML, JavaScript, Attribute, CSS) before rendering user data.
2. Content Security Policy (CSP) Deploy a rigorous CSP header to restrict script execution exclusively to trusted domains.
3. Framework Defenses Utilize native UI framework protections (e.g., React DOM escaping) and avoid dangerouslySetInnerHTML.
Vulnerability Signature
// Example DOM-based XSS vulnerability
const user_input = new URLSearchParams(window.location.search).get('q');
// VULNERABLE: Direct insertion into innerHTML
document.getElementById('results').innerHTML = "Results for: " + user_input;
// EXPLOIT PAYLOAD: ?q=\<img src=x onerror=alert(document.cookie)\>
References and Sources
Vulnerability Code Signature
Attack Data Flow
| Stage | Detail |
|---|---|
| Source | Untrusted User Input |
| Vector | Input flows through the application logic without sanitization |
| Sink | Execution or Rendering Sink |
| Impact | Application compromise, Logic Bypass, Data Exfiltration |
Vulnerable Code Pattern
# ❌ VULNERABLE: Unsanitized Input Flow
def process_request(request):
user_input = request.GET.get('data')
# Taint sink: processing untrusted data
execute_logic(user_input)
return {"status": "success"}
Secure Code Pattern
# ✅ SECURE: Input Validation & Sanitization
def process_request(request):
user_input = request.GET.get('data')
# Sanitized boundary check
if not is_valid_format(user_input):
raise ValueError("Invalid input format")
sanitized_data = sanitize(user_input)
execute_logic(sanitized_data)
return {"status": "success"}
How Precogs Detects This
Precogs AI Analysis Engine maps untrusted input directly to execution sinks to catch complex application security vulnerabilities.\n